Shortly after moving into their ideal new home, a couple grows concerned when their young daughter begins encountering mysterious strangers that no one else can see. The couple's greatest fear is realized when they themselves begin to witness terrifying phenomena in and around the house, providing clues that could unlock a chilling mystery that has remained a closely guarded secret for generations.
RELEASE DATE
2011
CURRENT STATUS
Pre-Production
LANGUAGE
English
PRODUCED BY
Gold Circle Films
Buffalo Gal Pictures
MPAA RATING
N/A
|
DIRECTED BY
Tom Elkins
WRITTEN BY
David Coggeshall
STARRING
Emily Alyn Lind
Chad Michael Murray
Abigail Spencer
Katee Sackhoff
Cicely Tyson
|
PROJECT DETAILS
- Set to begin filming this November 2010 in Louisiana.
- Filming was originally aimed to begin sometime in August 2010 in Winnipeg, Canada.
- This marks editor Tom Elkins' (Wanted, The Haunting in Connecticut) directorial debut.
- Ti West (The Roost, Cabin Fever 2: Spring Fever) was originally set to direct, but left the project due to creative differences.
- Loosely based on the supernatural accounts of the real-life Wyrick family.
- The sequel to 2009's The Haunting in Connecticut.
GALLERY
VIDEOS
REVIEW
INTERVIEWS
HEADLINES
I can't wait for this I hope they at least try to make it creepy.
Is this going to theaters or straight to DVD?
If u don't like it,dont watch it
okay clownshoes- Theres a program on the discovery channel called "A Haunting". Its a series of hour long dramatic re-enactments of people's supposedly true haunted house experiences. Really, an awesome show. A Haunting in Connecticut was based on one of these episodes and jazzed up a little excessively. So expect the same with A Haunting in Georgia-
However- the TV version of the Connecticut Haunting was soooo much better, eerier and had the actual family telling the story in an interview.
Awesome show and totally worth a few watches.
Anyway, heres the plot:
The family contacts William G. Roll, a parapsychologist. Dr. Roll's instruments indicate an unusually high concentration of positive ions in the house, and his research reveals that the house lies near a fault line; an earthquake has created a magnetic field in the area. He therefore explains the haunting as hallucinations caused by the ions creating minor interference with the family's brain function. This explanation is noticeably more scientific than is usually offered in episodes of the series.
However, further research reveals that a kindly old man named Gordy used to serve as caretaker for the property, and that a man named Lon (which Heidi misheard as "Khan") once lost his hand in an accident nearby; photos of both men match Heidi's descriptions, even though they both had died decades before Heidi was even born. In light of these developments, Dr. Roll amends his theory, and explains that the family, especially Heidi, is genetically predisposed toward psychic abilities that allow her to detect "place memories" -- energy left behind by past events and people that have been "recorded" into the environment. However, Dr. Roll maintains that these are natural conditions, and are neither dangerous nor paranormal in nature.
As years go by, the hauntings become more disturbing. The kindly Mr. Gordy appears less and less as Heidi grows older, until he eventually disappears altogether. The terrifying Dark Figure, however, appears more frequently, and Heidi is no longer the only one who sees him. The ghost of a little girl also appears to several family members. In addition, voices and other sounds disturb visitors to the house and the entire family (even members not living in the house). Dissatisfied with Dr. Roll's explanation, the Wyricks consult two psychics, who independently claim to detect several spirits in the home, some benevolent and some evil. The psychics disagree, however, about the nature of the evil spirits; the first psychic, Amy Allan, does not believe in demons, while the second psychic, who attends Mrs. Wyrick's church, agrees with Mrs. Wyrick's assumption that the evil spirits are demonic. In response, the Wyricks turn to their church for help. The pastor's prayers for the family temporarily put their minds at ease, although when they return home, they realize that, regardless of which explanation of the hauntings is accurate (hallucination, place memory, ghosts, demonic activity), their faith can serve as a comfort, but not as a means of ceasing the hauntings
...and to the rest of you whiney jack-holes out there- just be GLAD, true or not, that ORIGINAL movies are being made and youre not dealing with more half-ass "rehashings", "remakes" or bearded-trailer-park-whitetrash-hee-f'in-haw-sherrimoonforceddownyourthroat-heyLOOKitssidhaig, ken foree, bill moseley and whatever relic from exploitation-horror's past "unique re-visionings"...
nicely said .. 10 points ! : P
Can't wait too see this
the haunting in Con. was good and i will probably get this too. Mabye the other was true events mabye not no one knows but just by saying its true events never get your hopes up. the best movie that can back up true events is The Strangers. o and true event movies r better to watch because they make you wonder
If this is going to be anything like a haunting on conn UGH don't waste your time. The fact the only reason they made so much money was cos people actually believed it really happened makes me sicker.
To know people are that desperate to lie for money UGH whatever I'm sure this will be just as bad Like Amityville was faked Lets keep giving people's fake 'True Stories' money -.-
dude shut your mouth who cares if its true or not it was a good movie
It's only good to children who scare easy lol
Thats hilarious because I'm not a kid who scares... at all... and it was good
mabye but it was a good movie and what would they say "this is not based on true events!" just enjoy the movie they only say that to add affect don't have a hissy fit! o and i never said this was scary because it wasn't i just like these kinds of movies
No they don't have to say "this is not based on true events" because that would be stupid as all hell. They could always do like pretty much every other movies does: watch this new movie.
ok yes it sounds dumb i was just trying to prove a point. y cant everyone just enjoy the movie and not complain
because it's lame...
c'mon guyyyyyys it's hella-lame OMG... "because it's lame" is the most half-assed, cop-out, sad-sack excuse for a reason to bash on anything I've ever unfortunately read. Intelligence. Got Some?
Calm down jackass. It's lame because it's the same bullshit haunted house story that they have done over and over again. "There's some fucked up shit going on, lets go to the library or see that old priest and find out that some occult type shit was going on 50 years ago. Oh no the books on the occult or priest weren't able to help, lets move." The end.
I mean I love the supernatural, I've experienced shit before, heard voices, been in cabins that shook, seen shadow people.
The show A Haunting... is cheesy and lame. The stories aren't creepy. The acting in the reenactments is so god awful that I want to vomit anytime I watch it.
And as for my "because it's lame" comment it was me playing the role of the antagonist because I was bored.
Sorry you were so unfortunate in reading my comment.
I'd be careful throwing out the Jackass card there, my friend. First off, every idea you can possibly throw out for a ghost story has been done. TO DEATH (pun intended)
Now- on to the basic fundamentals of hauntings. Catholics yes, will look for a priest because they have that thing called spirituality. It's a relatable fact. So, really, seeking spiritual guidance during a time of paranormal threat is pretty logical and surely common. I'm sure people who go through it or write it aren't really thinking of going against the grain of common social and spiritual action.
Forward- your standards, are too high. If youre going to be an uptight prick about everything that passes your super-keen and surely beady little eyes, you'll seldom find entertainment, except maybe in your own snarky comments. Neener.
Next up, A Haunting, if it makes you want to vomit, just means youre truely a winner for AssClown of the Year Award- really? Vomit? You must reallllllllllly fuss yourself into some kinda emotional distress. La-Di-Da-Di.
Next- originality, a family with a sick kid buys a house closer to the hospital he's treated at, which turns out to be an old funeral home? Can you name me the repetitive films before this that did that formula?
Next up- So, you've been in shaking cabins, haunted houses, heard voices and have seen shadow people. MmKay, so uh, what'd ya do, waggle your finger, snap your bubble-gum and tell the ghosts just how cliche and hella-lame they are? Betcha wet yourself just a little and were probably asking god for help.
All this aside, though this is a rousing game of best-of-verbal-assault, it's not as stagnant or "lame" as you claim it is, you've just jaded yourself and will be in for a lifetime of self-induced disappointment. I'd move on to chick-flicks.
To your first comment: I am aware that pretty much every ghost story has been done to death, and that is not a bad thing. I just feel that the "go the the library" thing is boring. It doesn't entertain me.
As for the priest thing, though it is true, most of the "go the a priest movies" the people are either not Catholic at all or at least not portrayed as such until they go to the priest. Again, this type of movie is boring to me.
Next, my standards are actually relatively low. I have very easily entertained. Again these type of supernatural movies do not entertain me. My hole "because it's lame" comment was directed at someone else saying "why can't everyone just enjoy it" in which I was stating that not everyone will enjoy it because they feel that it is lame.
As for the vomit comment, it's called a figure of speech. As in it is such poor acting quality that I do not enjoy watching it. If anybody truly does vomit because of bad acting they should get check out.
On to originality. I'm not saying the general premise is not new. I'm talking about the go the the library/priest thing being Being over done. Again not my cup of tea.
As for my experiences with the supernatural. I saw the shadow people when I was very young and I was terrified of the dark until I was probably 13. The cabin incident caused me to run like fuck, and I was about 16. The voices were an EVP about a year ago in my girlfriends basement, and at that point though it was very creepy I just accepted it. And as for god, I'm an atheist, so there was no asking for help. And I'm not one of those pseudo atheist who shove it down your throat.
Is the whole chick-flick comment supposed to be an insult? Because if so it fail.
I enjoy movies, I know what I like and I know what I don't like. I don't watch movies that would disappoint me. And I'm not some asshole who is going to rip on someone for liking something I don't. If you like these kinds of movies then good for you. Watch them, be entertained by them. Have fun. And if it ends up being something you like then it's not a waste of your money or time. But to me these are lame.
Well if that stuff bores you so much, why bother watching movies like this anyways? And if you don't... why bother COMMENTING on movies like these... lmao
I don't watch movies like this. I was just looking at what people were saying about it and well someone said something dumb so I called them out on it. But whatever.
Hey fucker me again was that dumb comment for you NO it wasnt you just decided to join my conversation with someone else and start runin your mouth and if you are speeking of me you didnt call me out on it but know theres more people that dont like no suprise JACKASS!!!!!
Dude, chill, there is no need to get pissed, yes I started running my mouth, but your comment was just plain stupid. If that offends you then I'm sorry, but if you really look at it was dumb.
My previous comment was just me stating why I comment in the first place. I wasn't calling you dumb, I wasn't trying to piss you off, I don't know you, I was just stating my case.
i said it was dumb and trying to prove a point then said the movie was ok and you say it was lame well guess what i like these kinda movies for many reasons and it doesnt scare!
Exactly, I said a few posts above this that if anyone is into this kind of thing then good for them. I'm glad they are entertained by this. I personally am not, and I know several other people who are not (I also know plenty who are.)
My comment about I being lame should have been more clear in me saying that not everyone is going to enjoy this, obliviously.
Quiet Freddy, grownups are talking-
Ohnim, I like you. This banter has been most entertaining.
It's rare I find someone else in the comments that can articulate or atleast be gramatically and intellectually on point. Or, manage to go point/ counter-point without the classic "fuck you fucker, you fuckity-fuck arrrrrgh" comeback.
Say.... off topic, what do you think of Rob Zombie and Uwe Boll.....?
God awful. Especially Uwe Boll, dude makes my head hurt.
I sat through maybe an hour of "Seed" because it was what was being watched at a friend's apt. and I tell you, it almost made me turn my back on the genre completely. Have you signed the Uwe Boll petition yet? He openly agreed that 1 million signatures would get him to retire... then again, he still wants to box with Michael Bay.
...and Rob Zombie? ugh, I could write an entire manuscript on why he should've joined the Kurt Cobain-go-Bang club back in '98.