The House of the Devil (2009)
House of the Devil is a film that I really wanted to like -- writer/director Ti West successfully captured an 80's look and 70's feel for the flick, but that's sadly pretty much all the movie really has to offer. It's essentially a movie that's all atmosphere and nothing else. The story is quite simple and reminiscent of another recent indie effort called Babysitter Wanted, which I actually enjoyed quite a bit.
We follow the desperate college sophomore, Samantha, as she decides to phone about a babysitting gig from an ad she saw around campus. In need of the money, she accepts the job, despite it being in the middle of nowhere (naturally). Thinking it would be a simple task, she gets her friend Megan (Greta Gerwig) to drive her to the isolated home.
The two are greeted by a strange tall man (Tom Noonan), who soon reveals to the would-be babysitter that it isn't a child she's looking after, but the man's fragile old mother. Hesitant at first, but reality quickly sets in that she's in dire need of the extra money, so she accepts. What Samantha doesn't realize is that she will soon be the
key to a Satanic ritual that's to be held later that night during the lunar eclipse.The premise sounds intriguing enough, but the movie isn't as exciting as the story makes it out to be. For the first 30-or-so-minutes we're introduced to the key characters, then I expected the pacing to shift once the lead enters the home for the babysitting job -- ah, not quite. Instead, we're given about 25-minutes of the girl randomly walking around the house, opening shelves, doors, listening to music, and sitting on the couch.
Occasionally we're given a few creeks or stomping around, letting us know that the girl is still babysitting the woman (whom we never see by the way). It's not until the last 15-20-minutes that we're finally introduced to the ritual aspect of the movie and the pacing FINALLY changes. By this time, however, the film would have likely lost the viewers interest, which is exactly what happened to me.
The acting is decent and there's a nice bloody death half-way through the flick, but it's incredibly abrupt. We don't get anything else in terms of violence or gore until the last bits of the movie, since we're too busy following the babysitter as she does nothing but walk around the house and bore herself to death. It's not a good sign when the viewer is just as bored as the character they're watching.
Like I said before, I really wanted to like the movie, but I couldn't. It's hard to like a movie that really doesn't offer anything to the viewer. It has a nice retro look and is atmospheric at times, but nothing is developed and the pacing doesn't change at all. Then we're suddenly thrown this ritual towards the end and what should have happened a long time ago finally happens in the last 15 minutes. Unless you want a really slow paced movie with a lot of walking around and opening random doors, I'd recommend skipping this.
| Posted on November 9, 2009 - 12:32am | FrighT MasteR |









i watched this last night and was pretty let down...this has some serious pacing problems. with exception to one scene pretty early, NOTHING happens at all until a little after the hour mark. the climax is not at all surprising (surprisingly dull and predictable, actually). the whole 80's throwback vibe was over the top; and i almost had the feeling that instead of being scared, interested, or engaged, that i was supposed to simply be impressed with 80's references and styles alone.
"babysitter wanted" is a similar movie...it isn't great by any means, but it's easily better than "house of the devil," not that that really means much at all....
A very creepy, chilling, satanic/horror movie that looked like it came out from the year 1979 or 1980, that was like one part old school John Carpenter stalk and slash flick and one part David Cronenberg. I like how it focused on the more simple things in horror movies than being overly violent and over the top but it did get a bit wacky towards the end and loses the suspense and terror and fear a bit but it never loses its creep factor and the ending was shocking and bizarre but it just didn't explain alot of the stuff the was happening. This is very similar to another satanic/horror flick Babysitter Wanted which still isn't released here in the United States and I wonder if they are both based on the same story. I thought it had a promising beginning but the last act was just too weird to be scary but it was very creepy and unnerving but it just fell short on being truly great, memorable and terrifying but it was a solid throwback to horror movies of the late 70's early 80's and I appreciate what they brought to the plate, very retro! Overall if you like throwbacks and satanic/horror flicks there is plenty of things to like about it but if you want something more in your horror movies like story or realism than look elsewhere. If you are going to watch it watch it by yourself at night with the lights off because it sure will spook you a little bit. Rent instead!
The attention to detail to make this feel like an 80's horror film is great. The costumes, sets, hair styles, and other various things work perfectly. But agreed with reviewer, this movie is boring. I'm almost done watching it but so far I had to break it up into 2 sittings. I hope it pays off in the ending.
Trust me it doesn't pay off in the ending.........this movie was boring and pointless.....besides the devil being related to the house ritual and Samantha.