[Rec] 2 (2009)
| |
A couple years after the first film's release, creators Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza return with [Rec] 2, starting off literally seconds after the events of the previous installment. In this movie we follow a group of SWAT members, who are sent into the building with a man from the Ministry of Health to assess the situation and hopefully find answers on the infection. At least that's what we're lead to believe, until the man from the Health department reveals himself to be a priest on a secret mission to retrieve an experimental vile of the infected blood. This is where
the movie goes towards an incredibly different, but interesting, direction than its predecessor.Hinted at towards the end of the first movie, the priest goes on to reveal that the Medeiros girl (skinny chick at the very end of the first movie) was possessed as a child and the church brought on a special priest to conduct experiments on her, in hopes of isolating the possession and somehow coming up with a cure for it with a combination of scientific and spiritual means. Somewhere along the way things went wrong, and the possession has turned into a virus that can now be spread via means of blood or a bite. The only way to stop it from spreading is to retrieve blood from the Medeiros girl and bring it back to the church for further study. If only it were that easy..

What was once a simple infection film has now crossed into supernatural realms, dealing more with people suffering demonic possession than anything. In this movie the infected talk and mimic voices and can even climb on ceilings! Fans of the first pic will be divided by the direction the sequel has decided to take, however I found it refreshing. The filmmakers successfully combined two normally separate sub-genres and transformed it into something new and interesting. We see the return of a handful of the key characters from the first (as infected of course), but some of their appearances are rather short, so you may end up missing them among the chaos.
Of course with the change of theme, the film does run into a couple plot-holes, like for instance why weren't the
infected crawling on ceilings or talking in the first? However, one could choose to accept the fact that they had no need to speak since there was no priest there to call them out (not sure 'bout the ceiling thing though). The infected in this movie also seem harder to kill and turn much faster than I remember. The film also suffers from a little filler sub-story half-way through, when we take a break from following the SWAT and focus on a new set of characters whom find their way into the apartment. The characters turn out to be a few annoying thrill-seeking kids with a camcorder that follow Jennifer's father (who left in the first to get medicine) and a fireman through the sewers that lead to a secret path inside the apartment, which I'm sure would have been used in the first had not been for the sudden death of the person who was going to reveal its existence.
Not only are these kids unlikable, but their whole sub-plot seemed completely pointless. Their presence on screen did very little to move the story along and seemed to only be there for running time purposes.Another different aspect in the sequel is the use of the POV camera -- since we're primarily following these SWAT guys they have small mounted cameras on their helmets that we occasionally see through. This naturally results in a lot of incredibly shaky scenes; more-so than the first. This will also likely be a turn-off for fans, but it didn't really bother me much and seemed to add more to the suspense and claustrophobic feel that the filmmakers were aiming for. Speaking of which, the movie offers quite a few good tense moments and scare sequences, but it pales in comparison to the first.
A good sequel that's less on scares, but more on action. The different change in theme from a simple infection movie to a combination with demonic possession will likely turn fans away, while others (like myself) will find it refreshing. If you've seen the first then you'll definitely want to take a look at this sequel. Whether you like the direction it decided to take or not, it's still a worthy addition to the genre.
| Posted on March 1, 2010 - 3:46pm | FrighT MasteR |









This is the best sequel to a zombie movie that I've ever seen. This blew 28 weeks later right out the water on this one, but really go watch it if you liked the original. (I've actually never seen the original but i've see Quarantine which I've heard was a like shot for shot remake)
If you liked the first one you should totally this one!
It tells the story of the first movie true the eyes of different people, people who are not inside the building as it went down.
The first one is gonna stay the best, but this is a really good sequel.
I liked this movie, but the thing that killed it for me was the annoying kids!!! I was wishing for them to die the whole time!!!!! That is the only thing that spoiled what would've been an 8/10 for me, but I knocked it down to a 7/10!!!! Are they making a third one? I'll give it a looksie!!!
I've never seen Rec only the american version Quarantine which scared the living crap outta me. From what everyone says Rec is way better and from where the story seems to be going its probably going to be better than wherever Quarantine goes with it. Side note.....is it just me or does the premise here remind anyone of Dario Argentos Demons?
When the first [rec] came out i missed it but saw the american version Quarantine. It took the scares away from [rec] which i later got around to see. However i dont really care if the zombie's end up demonic, all i want is a decent horror flick that will scare me to death and this sounds like a good one.
I enjoyed REC 2! It got annoying at times but the zombies were good and scary!!!!!!! My sister liked it after she knew they weren't zombies... She believes that there can be a possibility zombies can happen and become crazy... We got crazy people already so the crazier they'll be if they got some kind of unknown virus...
certain aspects i liked others i didnt. was watching a pretty poor copy though so could someone tell me
I really enjoyed this I thought the change of theme was a good idea especially when your just expecting it to be a virus, It mixed it up, virus films are 10 a penny nowadays and this doesen't stray a million miles away from that but just far enough to make it stand out, it's the padding REC needed if it was to carry us into a franchise. This is more action but is still a tense film and judging on my girlfriend it's got plenty of jumps and scares.
Lets just hope this doesn't mean there will be Quarentine 2.
They're making a Quarentine 2, but thank the gods of horror that its not an american remake of [REC]2 like the first was on [REC], I don't understand why the USA has to remake movies that get sent here from other places, if they are sent here, they were meant for us to watch also, not for us to make a remake
^^ I agree with you so much.
I can kind of agree with the review. I will say the change in theme kinda turned me off as I can't see demonic possession spreading via biting or whatnot. I myself feel there was a bit too much time spent looking and not enough time killing
. Overall I would have given it a 6 myself.
Where can I see this with English subs ? I really don't want to wait until July.
I watched a cam version with no subs, and liked it as much as anyone could like a movie without knowing what's going on.
You should be able to find it on the net easily enough
nice review ,cant wait to see this movie , do you think a 7 is a little harsh would an 8 be better!