Sorority Row (2009)
Have you seen any of the trailers or TV spots for the remake of The House on Sorority Row, simply called Sorority Row? Good, you have. Then it should come as no surprise that the latest addition to my beloved slasher subgenre is EXACTLY what you expect it to be. Sorority Row treads familiar territory, but it has more in common with the slasher boom of the late 90s than the 1983 gem that inspired it. Except with more boobies…lots of more boobies.
Much like the My Bloody Valentine remake from earlier this year, Sorority Row sees a welcomed returned to the costumed, who done it slash fests that populated the 80s and made a comeback in the late 90s. And that might be its biggest flaw. It’s ten years too late. While Valentine
had the 3D gimmick to get people into the seats, there’s nothing really special or noteworthy about Sorority Row that makes it stand out (aside from the really ridiculously good looking cast.) It’s not that it’s a badly made movie, just typical material. I’m also not sure who Summit Entertainment, the studio behind the Twilight juggernaut, was marketing the film to. It clearly aimed it at young teens, but they’re not old enough to see it. Ten years plus back when Scream revived the slasher, movie theatres were much more lenient on letting young teens in. I remember my parents buying the tickets and not being questioned by the theatre once when walking in with my friends. Not the case anymore since during my viewing of the film had teens being dragged out by the theatre manager. Because of this I’m not surprised about its underperformance at the box office.
In paint by numbers fashion, a sorority prank towards one of the slutty sisters’ cheating boyfriend goes awry when said slutty sister, Megan, winds up dead with a tire iron shoved through her chest. Not the first time she’s had a stiff rod
shoved into her, I can assure you, but the first time the moans and cries are real. So what is a group of lingerie clad girls to do? Shove that bitch down a mine shaft. Duh. This is when the stock characters become fully developed. The bitch (Jessica), the nerd (Ellie), the floozy (Chugs), the retard (Claire), and the good girl who wants to do the right thing (Cassidy). The characters are saved thanks to strong dialogue from writers Josh Stolberg and Pete Gold finger (Rob Zombie can take a lesson on writing young females from these guys) and shockingly charismatic acting from the young, nubile cast. We cut to months later when the girls’ graduation celebration is interrupted by texts messages from their purposively dead friend.While Cassidy, played by Briana Evigan, is our lead final girl, it’s Leah Pipes as the HBIC Jessica who steals the movie. She plays it not only as a bitch, but a bitch with a dark and cynical sense of humor. Also notable is Rumer Willis as nerd Ellie. She continuously walks the thin line between lovable and annoying, but is capable enough not to lean over to annoyance.
And for any lovers of shitty yet addictive reality TV, Audrina Patridge as the ill fated Megan is hardly in the movie long enough to judge her performance, but she does look damn good in white lace. And yes, it’s none other than Carrie Fisher as the shot gun toting house mother. And yes, she steals every scene she’s in. Unfortunately her scenes are far too few. While the house mother in the original was essentially the lead for the first act of the movie, the character in this film is sorely missed for the majority of the running time.Sorority Row comes to us courtesy of director Stewart Hendler and this dude is no bullshit. The film has a contagious energy that never lets up from the opening party, to the fiery finale. While the original film took it’s time to establish the prank and the reasons behind it, this one just grabs you from the get go and doesn’t let go. The third act is oozing with tension, something most horror directors today seem to always overlook. His staging of the deaths scenes was interesting as some of them were deliciously bloody, while others were silhouetted or off screen. There’s a large body count so it worked to leave a few of the deaths to the viewer’s imagination. It’s a more polished and prettier movie than, say, Halloween II, so an onslaught of unbelievably brutal deaths would have felt out of place.

Where Sorority Row hits rough road is the lack of development with some plot points and characters. Megan’s sister shows up and is a very plausible suspect, but then she disappears for almost the entire movie, save for a few scenes at the end. Megan’s boyfriend who was the target of the prank is also MIA for most of the film, only to show up for one more scene. The writers did a fairly admirable job at giving most of the characters purpose within the world, but these two felt like afterthoughts in the game.
As for the reveal of the killer, it’s pretty easy to guess the identity by the end solely by deduction. Which is fine. I’ve seen WAY too many slasher films to not be able to figure it out. It’s their motives that are complete and utter horse shit. And while there’s a wink to the original’s murder weapon hidden in this film, I was sad to not see a cameo of the infamous harlequin clown costume from the original that filled my childhood with more nightmares than Pennywise ever could.
Sorority Row is exactly what you expect it to be; A typical slasher film that plays by the rules. Only this time it’s well acted, thanks to all the lovely leading ladies, with believable dialogue and an electric directing style. While it’s a wicked fun watch for die hard slasher fans like myself and better than it has any business being, there’s just nothing innovative or original about its narrative to push it out of the set mold.
| Posted on September 17, 2009 - 4:10am | Johnny D |









A sequal to this is supposedly being made
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorority_Row:_2
Anyone think there's any truth to this?
very nice plot
good acting
also a good suprise element
This movie's pretty cool. Interesting characters and dialogue, a really unique and cool weapon (though I do agree the costume could have used more thought) and some pretty cool kills. I do wish we could have actually seen the whole flare gun thing happen instead of just the aftermath. I've never seen the original, but I want to. And I know people thinks this is like "I know what you did last summer" but being a remake of an 80's film, doesn't that mean IKWYDLS ripped offed the original "House on Sorority Row" idea of covering up a crime and suffering dire consequences? Unless Lois Duncan's book came out before the original Sorority Row, IDK.
This movie had a plot that seemed to be used frequently but the killer turns out to be somebody abosultly nobody'd expect. I was scared out of my mind while watching this tonight but I thoroughly enjoyed it's elaborate death scenes and witty dialogue.
It was pretty obvious this film would prey on the same formula that most conventional slashers ALWAYS do, but for me what made this a joy to watch is that it reminded me of how a successful slasher can be achieved.
Great acting, good dialogue and enough jumps and scares to keep you shittin' it throughout. I also like that the girls didn't just seem like a bunch of helpless bimbo's being stalked and picked off.
Another novelty was the streak of dark humour weaving it's way through the movie. Jessica (Leah pipes) truly should be an icon to all horror movie 'damsels in distress, demonstrating just how it is possible to show you've got a pair and look hot all in one breath!!
It reminds me of Scream in the way that it is clever and doesn't seem to take itself too seriously. It knows what it is and delivers the goods
It may not have have pushed the bar much higher than many before it, but Sorority Row was well worth my time and will definately be worth yours!
what to say about this Remake, For most who know me Im not a huge fan of remakes and for that I will say it is no where near as good as the Original for this reason in 1983, this was a ground breaker for slasher flicks with that twist at the end. It was about revenge.And for that it will always remain # 1, however this remake wasnt terrible. I loved how they switched it up. The girls are hotter and the deaths are more unique. My question is, where is the revenge factor? It was completely taken out therefore her death was never avenged. They added characters to give you the illusion. But took the twist and added some cheesy conclusion. Owell I guess because it was entertaing. Briana Evigan has kinda grown on me since the Donnie Darko days. She did an awesome job, and was happy to see the lead go to her. All and all its Fair. Not horrible, not great. Different. Kinda took away from the whole point of the original, a Revenge killing spree to Advenge a death out of pain and hate. They changed it up. Still good.
I never seen the first one yet and yes I agree on leave some classics alone, The flim was alot like Iknow what u did last summer and this flim was pretty good plot and hopefuly they leave it alone from here
I thought Sorority Row though somewhat entertaining in a guilty pleasure type of way was too predictable, humorous with dry kills and no brains for its own good and is not nearly as good, creepy or thrilling as the original but I do admit it was more fun with hotter chicks as the leads and the acting was slightly better if about the same but they did play better bitches this time around. The killer this time was lame with a bada$$ weapon it didn't deserve and is a black hooded outfit the best disguise they could come up with, come on talk about unoriginality!!! Anyways they should of stuck with the original story and improve the kills and stuck with the creepy harlequin costume but they didn't. It was like a combination of The In Crowd, Black Christmas(remake), Very Bad Things, Prom Night(remake) and a little of IKWYDLS, but it was more of a dark comedy with a body count than a pure horror slasher flick if you ask me. Still though it was a better remake than Prom Night, Black Christmas and definitely Friday The 13th. The ending opens a door to a possible sequel but I say why bother because this one was just not that scary or worthy enough for a sequel and it makes me wonder if the people in the horror genre is even trying hard anymore to deliver a quality horror picture. If this makes alot of money they will probably go through with a sequel, that's just how they do it these days. Rental!
I AM GONNA HAVE AGREE THESE DAYS THEY CUT SO MUCH HORROR SCENES OUT OF THE FLIMS ITS LIKE NO FUN WHERE CLASSIC BLOOD , GUTS RIP OUT , ITS LIKE WTF ?? THATS WHY THEY MAKE ALOT MOVIES UNRATED WHICH IS STUPID LIKE YOU GET PARTS HERE IN THERE WHICH ISNT BIG OF DEAL OF THE MOVIE JUST WHAT EXTRA TIT SHOT OR LIL MORE BLODD CUT OUT 10 MINS OF THE FLIM MOST 15 MINS KINDA STUPID . I WOULDNT MIND GOING FOR REMAKE OF IT WITH ALOT KILLING AND HORROR ADDED 2 IT .