The Ward (2010)
| |
Oh, John Carpenter, how I've missed thee. With the exception of directing a couple episodes of the terrible Master's of Horror series, this marks the horror maestro's return to feature film, after a decade long hiatus. Sadly, it seems the long wait for his return was a fruitless one. Instead of delivering an original piece of work, he's going
off an incredibly mediocre script and contributing very little of what we're used to seeing from him. He doesn't even score his own films anymore! It's a sad time to be an old horror fan, seeing all the greats resort to mediocre-to-bad genre efforts, but I digress.The story revolves around Amber Heard's character, as she's escorted off to a mental asylum after setting a house on fire. Not long after staying there she begins to notice strange things, primarily the appearance of a spooky looking
female apparition. She eventually meets a small group of diverse "crazy" women that she befriends over time. From her own investigative work, and her new found friends, she eventually discovers that this malevolent spirit is the result of the death of a former patient (how original). As each patient begins to disappear one by one, it's up to the remaining few to either escape or somehow put a stop to the ghost.The Ward is a mediocre feature, giving us nothing we haven't already seen before. Even down to its eye-rolling ending, which was easily predicted if you center a movie around the patients in a mental asylum, as movies like that
normally only end in less than handful of ways. The flick primarily focuses on pop-up scares the entire time, leaving very little room for creativity. Though, as for the biggest issue I had with the film, I would have to once again refer to the ending, which conveniently allows all the plot-holes I noticed throughout the flick to be easily shrugged off.In all honesty, the flick could've been directed by anyone, and had I not already known that Carpenter directed it, I would never have guessed it was his work. However, on a more positive note, the film never bored me and the look of the evil spirit was above-average and was actually somewhat creepy in a couple scenes.
A sad and disappointing return for John Carpenter, as I found The Ward to be nothing more than an average film, packed with all the clichés that we're used to seeing from the genre. To top it off, the movie delivers a predictable climax that has not only been used before, but also seems to be a half-assed approach to not having to explain all the plot-holes encountered earlier on. A decent watch if you're not looking for anything original, but I'd advise skipping it otherwise.
| Posted on June 5, 2011 - 3:35pm | FrighT MasteR |








I think this movie was a more memorable feature from John Carpenter. Don't act like he's a major horror movie genius, aside from "The Fog", "Ghosts Of Mars" and of course "Halloween" John carpenter is still a stranger to the genre, and this movie was a lot better than a lot of those movies. I only remember "Halloween" not for it's scares but because Jamie Lee Curtis was a total badass. The characters in this movie are very complex and the plot twist may have been used before but it still made a lot of sense to the storyline. The acting was great and the main character is a very smart person. This is a film that deserves A LOT more recognition than given in your review.
No offense but you clearly aren't very knowledgeable about John Carpenter. The vast majority of his work is of the horror genre. Halloween, The Thing, Christine, The Fog, They Live, In The Mouth Of Madness, Village Of The Damned, Vampires, Prince Of Darkness, Ghosts Of Mars. In fact there are only a select few that are not... Escape From New York, Escape From LA, Big Trouble In Little China, Assault On Precinct 13. To suggest that John Carpenter is a stranger to horror kinda says that you are a stranger to watching it. The Ward was a paycheck for Mr. Carpenter, nothing more. For whatever reason you seemed to like this film, that's fine, but then again it doesn't seem as though we saw the same movie. I think that you may be the only person I know of to refer to the characters in this film as complex, those are some pretty low standards you've got there. The acting, all around, is quite horrendous, even when compared to you're everyday dime a dozen direct to DVD release. Anyway, you enjoyed it, I didn't, personally I think that UHM's review is right on the money.
When the most creative thing about a film is it's opening credit sequence than you know you've got a stinker on your hands. I've waited a long time for John Carpenter's return, and unfortunately this did nothing to reward my patience. In 1966 the police nab Kristen (Amber Heard) after she burns down an old farm house, she is thrown into the mental ward at North Bend Psychiatric hospital. All of the other patients are cardboard cut outs transplanted from Girl Interrupted, without the benefit of being able to act very well. In no time at all Kristen learns that there is a vengeful ghost wandering the halls at night, which proceeds to knock the women off one by one. This movie is lifelessly dull from start to finish, it's not violent enough to be in anyway entertaining, nor are it's shocks in the least bit scary. I kept my expectations low after reading the first wave of reviews, and now I'm surprised that it wasn't received even more harshly. If you can make it to the end without turning it off or falling asleep.. there awaits a Shutter Island-esque half assed attempt at a twist, followed by one of the lamest jump scares in recent memory, Carpenter probably just tacked it on for good measure.
Awesome Movie But Climax could have been better.I found it way better than previous carpenter Movies >)