UHM - Upcoming Horror Movies




RATING

5
DIRECTOR
Douglas Buck

CAST

Lou Doillon
Chloe Sevigny
Stephen Rea
David Cronenberg
Dallas Roberts
Gabrielle Rose
JR Bourne
William B. Davis

YEAR

2006

RUNTIME

92 minutes

DATE REVIEWED

1 / 06 / 08

SHOPPING

BUY THIS FILM
REVIEWER: FrighT MasteR

RATE THIS MOVIE:

 


RATED BY: 9 FAN(S)
CURRENT RATING:
2.89 SKULL(S)

Sisters


A remake of the 1973 Brian De Palma film with the same name, one would wonder why anyone would bother remaking a film like this. Usually remakes are only greenlit because they have a decent fanbase built behind the original film already, which pretty much guarantees some sort of profit. A film like Sisters wasn't exactly a success nor even known by many to begin with. I for one hadn't heard of the original until news of the remake broke out a few years back. When the project was first announced back in '04 Asia Argento was supposedly attached as the lead, but was eventually replaced by Anna Mouglalis, who was then replaced by Lou Doillon.

So the film follows Chloe Sevigny's character as an investigative reporter, who's looking to find out the truth behind Dr. Phillip Lacan (Stephen Rea) and his relationship with one of his patients (Lou Doillon). When the reporter breaks into the doctor's apartment, she discovers a computer monitor with video of the inside of another apartment building. While watching the footage she witnesses a murder, and suspects the female patient as the killer, and the doctor is somehow involved. The plot thickens when it's revealed that the real murderer may be the unseen twin of the young girl.

I have to admit that I went in with low-expectations, and actually found the movie to be fairly interesting, despite its many flaws. However, the script is so full of holes that it's just too hard to look past, and proves to be the biggest problem with the film. Not only that, but we pretty much follow one character for the first 40-minutes only to lead to his death on the computer monitor. Was following him for so long entirely necessary? Throw in some ridiculous detectives and a silly plot twist at the end, and you've got yet another pointless remake.

OVERALL

A potentially decent film had it not been riddled with plot holes. To make matters worse, we're delivered a silly ending that doesn't even make much sense. Watch at your own risk.




Comments page 1 of 1:
CLICK HERE TO COMMENT
Jason :
Posted 132 days ago
Watched this movie last night and have to say that it wasn't "that bad", but was most definitely weird. Gets to about the last 20 minutes in the movie and it totally flips out and goes crazy. Take the main reviewer's advice and watch at your own risk.
mallory :
Posted 170 days ago
"one would wonder why anyone would bother remaking a film like this."
Why would anyone bother to remake movies at all? Most of them are useless and terrible anyway...this is most likely no exception.
scotty :
Posted 192 days ago
sounds garbage
frightie :
Posted 331 days ago
Yeah, I can't seem to find a working one anymore.
Nik :
Posted 366 days ago
The trailer doesnt work.
 

UHM









UHM - Upcoming Horror Movies
Best viewed with Mozilla Firefox and a recommended screen resolution of 1024x768 +
Your upcoming horror movies resource since June 24th 1999.
Privacy Policy. This site is dedicated to my son Balin.