PDA

View Full Version : NFL's Best Wide Receiver (Currently) IYO



koolmike
11-06-2007, 09:43 AM
Wide Receivers - NFL's Best

Chad Johnson - Johnson has good size, stretches the field and has developed some of the NFL's best touchdown dances.:D

Marvin Harrison - Harrison and quarterback Peyton Manning have hooked up for more TDs than any other reciever-quarterback combo in NFL history. The Indy reciever runs good routes, has great concentration and always seems to end up at the right place at the right time.

Steve Smith - The Carolina Panthers' wide receiver doesn't have great height for a wide receiver but he has incredible speed and picks up great YAC (yards after catch - the number of yards a receiver picks up after catching the ball).

Randy Moss - When he's not mowing down cops with his car or mooning Green Bay Packers' fans, Randy Moss is a touchdown machine. Moss has great size, the NFL's best hands and would have better stats if the Oakland Raiders didn't have such a weak quarterback.

Terrell Owens - He may have a big mouth and even bigger ego, but T.O. is still one of the NFL's best receivers. He has great speed, good size and always wants the ball

I would go with Steve Smith. The man is explosive. I'd take him on my team over all the others.

Hmmm...but Marvin is so good as well. Tough call.

Opinions?

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-06-2007, 09:45 AM
All very good recievers.

Moss would be the easy pick because of the way he has helped the Pats this year but im gonna go with Steve Smith as well.

Guy is so explosive when he gets the ball.

Joker
11-06-2007, 09:48 AM
Randy Moss hands down,I've been sayin it for the past 10 years.Just look what he did his rookie year alone.
F'in Red Mccombs.

Joker
11-06-2007, 09:52 AM
Also IMO Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald or both better Receivers then Chad Johnson,they just play on the wrong tye of team.

Knight
11-06-2007, 10:16 AM
Pretty happy with the Pack's WR corps this year. Driver, Jennings, Jones.

koolmike
11-06-2007, 10:20 AM
Helps to have BF throwing the ball.

Fuckin' guy doesn't seem to age.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-06-2007, 10:20 AM
I saw Moss make one of his many rediculous circus catches against the Colts when the Pats were backed up in their own endzone. One of those one handed grabs. Ball was high and he still snatched it out of the air with one hand.

Nevertheless, I dont think he is that physical therefore I dont think hes the best.

Smith is a good choice and TO while tough to take down. Hes been prone to drops all his career.

Knight
11-06-2007, 10:24 AM
Helps to have BF throwing the ball.

True, but Favre isn't the one catching laser balls over the middle and beating defenders deep.

koolmike
11-06-2007, 10:25 AM
Agreed.

steelba
11-06-2007, 10:36 AM
Yeah Steve Smith at #1
Randy Moss at #2

Steve Smith gets the number one for being a beast WR with a shitty QB. I doubt any of the others would have stats like his with Jake Delhomme throwing to them.

T.O. is at #3 and Chad Johnson is at #4.
Marvin will take 5th. Having Peyton as your QB is a huge edge.

skybrick
11-06-2007, 03:17 PM
1. Moss
2. Smith
3. Johnson
4. Harrison
5. TO drops too many

steelba
11-06-2007, 04:10 PM
Wonder what kinda stats Steve Smith would have if he was on The Colts...

Revenant
11-06-2007, 06:37 PM
I'm gonna throw another name into the ring and go with TJ Houshmanzadeh, he may be shadowed by Chad Johnson, but the guy is a helluva good player. I think he has more TD's than Johnson this year as it is..

dr_foreverclear
11-06-2007, 06:43 PM
Randy Moss

skybrick
11-06-2007, 06:44 PM
prolly cause Johnson gets more coverage. Personally I like Burress as an elite because he is the only wonder on the Giants and he can make it happen.

Revenant
11-06-2007, 06:45 PM
prolly cause Johnson gets more coverage. Personally I like Burress as an elite because he is the only wonder on the Giants and he can make it happen.

true, but If I was a defensive coordinator I wouldn't feel safe against that Bengals Wideout corp.

LgOr
11-06-2007, 08:28 PM
He's not a receiver, but Jason Witten. He's hellava player and rarely drops the ball and runs a lot better than some of the receivers

Oravear
11-06-2007, 08:33 PM
Best receiver is kinda subjective.

Harrison I think I great but he is limited he isn't gonna get a ton a yards after the catch. I think he wouldn't be as dominate without manning passing him the ball.

TO drops too many passes.

Chad is solid he fights for yards and is an explosive player.

Same goes for Steve Smith, for his size the man is an animal.

Right now I think Moss is the best WR out there.

I gotta throw a shoutout to my man Burress on the Giants he is a beast

3/6
11-06-2007, 08:48 PM
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

skybrick
11-06-2007, 08:56 PM
good thing that pic is bandwidth exceeded, because its probably Willis McGayee

3/6
11-06-2007, 08:58 PM
well the topic is best WRs..last time i checkd willis was a RB
its ROy Williams...THE best wr in the nfl..lol...not the best but def. top 7

CrazySicilian
11-06-2007, 09:05 PM
Torry Holt.. when he has a QB that can get him the ball.

skybrick
11-06-2007, 09:06 PM
I guess you didn't sense the sarcasm through the computer. 36 you know I am not that much of a dumb ass.

koolmike
11-09-2007, 08:45 AM
well the topic is best WRs..last time i checkd willis was a RB


:lol:

skybrick
11-10-2007, 10:26 AM
:lol:

yeah... you would laugh at that fake shit.

Darkgod
11-21-2007, 12:43 PM
best wr is Moss. When its all said and done, Harrison will have the better career numbers, but Moss is better. it helps having a qb like peyton throsing to you for your entire career. Before the dolphins had a shit down meltdown, Chris Chambers was up there. he could catch everything thrown out of him.


As for Roy Williams, I guess 1 out of 5 first round draft picks better give you a good wr.

Knight
11-21-2007, 01:39 PM
it helps having a qb like peyton throsing to you for your entire career.

Are you serious? Peyton's been crap ever since Harrison's been out. Not to mention Harrison was a damn good player before Manning was even drafted.

Darkgod
11-21-2007, 05:50 PM
Yeah Im serious. Peyton is still one of the best qbs ever.

Knight
11-21-2007, 06:01 PM
Harrison would have been great regardless.

Darkgod
11-21-2007, 06:03 PM
Im not saying that. As you see I say he will overall be the best. The thing is it helps who was throwing to him. Rice is the best ever bar none, it didnt hurt him that Montana and then Yong where throwing to him.

Knight
11-21-2007, 06:10 PM
And maybe Rice made Montana and Young that much better as well? It works both ways. Football is a team sport.

Darkgod
11-21-2007, 06:12 PM
Well if thats your rationale then I guess the fb, and the rb, and line and ends help. Hell Marino is the best ever cause he did it with nothing. When Marc Clayton and Mark Duper are your best recievers, you are pretty good.

Knight
11-21-2007, 06:24 PM
Clayton and Duper were both solid players. Not sure where the idea comes from that they weren't. The notion that Marino 'did it with nothing' is a myth.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-21-2007, 08:24 PM
Marino was a legend.

I liked the guy, too bad he never won one. He never got that late career team boost that Elway did to get his championships. I respect Peyton Manning, obviously I dont really like him because he is part of the team that holds the main competition to the Pats. Nevertheless, I respect him.

Lotta fans out there get blinded and choose not to give props to the opposing teams great player(s). I try to when I can. Even when I despise the player(s).

Duff McCartney
11-22-2007, 12:06 AM
Clayton and Duper were both solid players. Not sure where the idea comes from that they weren't. The notion that Marino 'did it with nothing' is a myth.

I don't think it was you...but it could have been...but someone on this board said that Peyton Mannings TD record didn't mean as much because he had more than Marino had. They said that at the time Peyton broke it.

It might not have been you...it could have been Red with his constant Manning bashing.

Knight
11-22-2007, 01:08 AM
Don't recall saying that. I do think Marino's record is slightly more impressive because he didn't have a monster running game at the time to take the pressure off.

But 49 TD's is insane no matter what.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-22-2007, 10:04 AM
It might not have been you...it could have been Red with his constant Manning bashing.

I havent said much bad about Marino on this board. Probably someone else.

Hes a likeable guy.

Spoon
11-22-2007, 03:19 PM
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Darkgod
11-23-2007, 12:05 PM
Duper and Clayton are in no way on the same level as Wayne/Harrison. Not to mention Peyton had a consistant running game since coming into the leauge. MArino's best back was Kareem Abdul Jabar.

Duff McCartney
11-26-2007, 11:44 AM
I havent said much bad about Marino on this board. Probably someone else.

Hes a likeable guy.

I never said anything about Marino...I said about Manning. It might have been you that said that with your constant Manning bashing....at the time it could have been you that said Mannings record is less because of the better WRs he had...it was either you or Knight.

Knight
11-26-2007, 11:56 AM
Duff...who gives a shit about something that was posted God knows how long ago? And who gives a shit if someone chooses not to cock-gobble Manning on here?

koolmike
11-30-2007, 09:35 AM
yeah... you would laugh at that fake shit.

I'm laughing at what a skyprick you are.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-30-2007, 09:40 AM
One things for sure.

Moss has payed huge dividends here in New England this season but the past perception of him hasnt gone away in terms of his play.

Freakin hit the guy afew times and he folds like a chair. Owens is more physical but I'd still take Moss's hands. Both are having great seasons.

koolmike
11-30-2007, 09:45 AM
Sucked not being able to see the Packer/Cowboys game last night. DirectTV carries the NFL network and TWCable doesn't. I heard TO made some amazing catches last night.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-30-2007, 09:50 AM
Yeah NFL Network is becoming a liability.

Not sure if any changes are in the works, although I heard a rumor the other day that the NFL Network might be looking to acquire a full 16 game schedule for Thursdays.

Hopefully not the case.

koolmike
11-30-2007, 09:52 AM
Thanx.

skybrick
11-30-2007, 10:53 AM
I'm laughing at what a skyprick you are.

you really had no clue what those last comments are about. So i dont see one damn reason why you should comment on them.

koolmike
11-30-2007, 10:55 AM
<---knows all things :nod:

Max Payne
11-30-2007, 12:28 PM
One things for sure.

Moss has payed huge dividends here in New England this season but the past perception of him hasnt gone away in terms of his play.

Freakin hit the guy afew times and he folds like a chair. Owens is more physical but I'd still take Moss's hands. Both are having great seasons.


Why does this matter man? Dont feed the fire and look for something that isn't there like the fucking media is doing.

Moss is having a career year, so is Brady and the offense is having the single greatist year for any offense ever through 11 games, and none of this happens without Moss.

Moss clearly gets along with Brady and others, and one non "productive" game doesn't mean he was dogging it, or not trying his hardest when the ball wasn't coming his way, maybe just maybe he was shut down for a game.

Ill take a WR who has a hard time taking punishment off the line of scrimage like Moss, over a WR who has trouble hanging on to balls that hit his hands, ala Owens.

Moss has shown why he was making the money he was, and is in line for a huge pay increasment next year, and when the Pats give it to him, then you will know that they believe he wasn't dogging it.

R ę Đ Þ å Ŧ Ĥ
11-30-2007, 12:49 PM
I dont believe he was dogging it but I sure as hell believed what I saw and what I saw was a guy who took afew hits and folded.

But as you said, it was one game and the Eagles played a great game and had a masterful gameplan and probably should've won the game.

Joker
11-30-2007, 01:23 PM
Randy admited that he takes plays off,I dont see why it would be any different playing for the Patriots.Still there is no way I wouldnt want him on my team,the guy is the best.

Max Payne
11-30-2007, 02:07 PM
Id take plays off too known that no matter what I did, or how I did it my team was going to lose anyways.

Moss simply being on the field for the Pats opens things up for Welker and Stallworth, so no I don't think he takes plays off.

TacK
11-30-2007, 04:38 PM
I'm going to say Moss or T.O., I will say I like T.O. way better though.

skybrick
11-30-2007, 05:16 PM
I'm going to say Moss or T.O., I will say I like T.O. way better though.

you see T.O. drop that 5 yard pass right in the inzone that came right off his chest. He lead the league in drops last year, and it shouldn't matter how many times he gets the ball thrown to him.

steelba
11-30-2007, 05:49 PM
yeah that drop was bullshit.

Joker
11-30-2007, 06:51 PM
Id take plays off too known that no matter what I did, or how I did it my team was going to lose anyways.


Thats when I wouldnt want a player to take plays off.Tickets are expensive easily $100 dollars for nose bleed seats,and when a person spends their hard earned money to go and watch their favorite team,at least the athletes who are getting paid mucho bucks can do is at least give it their all for the fans.

The patriots have enough weapons,so it really doesnt matter,like you said he's just as effective as a decoy.

TacK
11-30-2007, 07:20 PM
you see T.O. drop that 5 yard pass right in the inzone that came right off his chest. He lead the league in drops last year, and it shouldn't matter how many times he gets the ball thrown to him.

Yeah I seen. It was bullshit

Max Payne
11-30-2007, 08:30 PM
Thats when I wouldnt want a player to take plays off.Tickets are expensive easily $100 dollars for nose bleed seats,and when a person spends their hard earned money to go and watch their favorite team,at least the athletes who are getting paid mucho bucks can do is at least give it their all for the fans.

The patriots have enough weapons,so it really doesnt matter,like you said he's just as effective as a decoy.

you would of been a fool to gone to any of those games moss ever played for with the raiders, you would of been getting ripped off even if moss put up 400 yard, 5 td games.