PDA

View Full Version : M. Night's The Happening poster

BooBerry
12-07-2007, 12:32 PM
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b93/YourBuddyBrandon/hr_The_Happening_poster.jpg

Looks sweet.
Chief Falling Rock
12-07-2007, 12:37 PM
whats this about again? I think he's been in a slump lately but I'll check this out if it looks good. I think the name is dumb too. The Happening? Its just random. I'm gonna entitle my movie "hey look I'm sitting down"
BooBerry
12-07-2007, 12:44 PM
It's supposedly about the world getting revenge on us via plants spores that make us commit suicide. Considering I can't think of another of title that would fit this besides "The Vengance" (ooh) , I like it.
Galerian
12-07-2007, 01:43 PM
His movies just keep getting worse and worse...This one might actually be alright but I'm not counting on it.
Toxic Voorhees
12-07-2007, 01:49 PM
I'll see this. I hear its his first R rated film.
BooBerry
12-07-2007, 02:51 PM
His movies just keep getting worse and worse...This one might actually be alright but I'm not counting on it.

I personally thought they were getting better. I loved Signs and The Village, but I was let down with Lady In The Water. So far its his only film I haven't liked.
FrighT MasteR
12-07-2007, 06:25 PM
The flicks got worse for me: liked sense, signs, hated how the village turned out and lady in the water sucked. This sounds okay.
skybrick
12-07-2007, 09:48 PM
I didn't even know the movie was still happening.
dead breed
12-08-2007, 01:28 PM
Looks good. Ill defiantly be checking this one out.
choptop2
12-08-2007, 04:44 PM
Interesting premise but Night's films are very hit or miss.
Cataclysm
12-08-2007, 04:50 PM
M. Night's movies have always been terrible (good ideas, shit execution), other than Unbreakable I can think of another movie with similar themes that are much better than his flicks.

Besides at the end of the day he only makes movies so he can star in them.
BooBerry
12-08-2007, 05:43 PM
Besides at the end of the day he only makes movies so he can star in them.

Movie*, hasn't been plural... yet.
Cataclysm
12-08-2007, 05:56 PM
Movie*, hasn't been plural... yet.

Don't get prancy with me.

With each movie he is asserting himself more and more, and is not just some background character so as far as I'm concerned it's movies.
BooBerry
12-08-2007, 06:10 PM
Don't get prancy with me.

With each movie he is asserting himself more and more, and is not just some background character so as far as I'm concerned it's movies.

Oh yeah, I completely forgot he did cameos in his other films. But then again, lots of people do that (Stephen King, Wes Craven, Zack Snyder). But I do agree about full on character roles. His part as a supporting actor in Lady was just nonsense.
dead breed
12-09-2007, 06:48 PM
Hitchcock also had cameos in some of his movies.
Misfit
12-09-2007, 06:51 PM
whats the twist ending for this....twist endings are getting annoying
Cataclysm
12-09-2007, 06:57 PM
Hitchcock also had cameos in some of his movies.

Big difference between having a cameo as a background character, and being a character that directly affects the storyline.
dead breed
12-09-2007, 07:03 PM
Big difference between having a cameo as a background character, and being a character that directly affects the storyline.

I didn't say there was a difference, I was just stating a fact :D
smokey
12-10-2007, 02:24 PM
I will be checking it out. I like his films.