PDA

View Full Version : California Octuplets' story grows stranger, raises ethical issues



Grendel
01-31-2009, 06:46 PM
Grandma: Octuplets mom obsessed with having kids
By Raquel Maria Dillon, Associated Press Writer

LOS ANGELES – The woman who gave birth to octuplets this week conceived all 14 of her children through in vitro fertilization, is not married and has been obsessed with having children since she was a teenager, her mother said.

Angela Suleman told The Associated Press she was not supportive when her daughter, Nadya Suleman, decided to have more embryos implanted last year.

"It can't go on any longer," she said in a phone interview Friday. "She's got six children and no husband. I was brought up the traditional way. I firmly believe in marriage. But she didn't want to get married."

Nadya Suleman, 33, gave birth Monday in nearby Bellflower. She was expected to remain in the hospital for at least a few more days, and her newborns for at least a month.

A spokeswoman at Kaiser Permanente Bellflower Medical Center said the babies were were progressing daily, with all eight breathing unassisted and being tube-fed.

While her daughter recovers, Angela Suleman is taking care of the other six children, ages 2 through 7, at the family home in Whittier, about 15 miles east of downtown Los Angeles.

She said she warned her daughter that when she gets home from the hospital, "I'm going to be gone."

Angela Suleman said her daughter always had trouble conceiving and underwent in vitro fertilization treatments because her fallopian tubes are "plugged up."

There were frozen embryos left over after her previous pregnancies and her daughter didn't want them destroyed, so she decided to have more children.

Her mother and doctors have said the woman was told she had the option to abort some of the embryos and, later, the fetuses. She refused.

Her mother said she does not believe her daughter will have any more children.

"She doesn't have any more (frozen embryos), so it's over now," she said. "It has to be."

Nadya Suleman wanted to have children since she was a teenager, "but luckily she couldn't," her mother said.

"Instead of becoming a kindergarten teacher or something, she started having them, but not the normal way," he mother said.

Her daughter's obsession with children caused Angela Suleman considerable stress, so she sought help from a psychologist, who told her to order her daughter out of the house.

"Maybe she wouldn't have had so many kids then, but she is a grown woman," Angela Suleman said. "I feel responsible and I didn't want to throw her out."

Little psychological research has been conducted on the reasons some mothers seem hooked on repeated pregnancies. David Diamond, a co-director for the Center for Reproductive Psychology in San Diego, said mothers can be drawn to repeat pregnancies for a number of reasons, with some finding the experience so satisfying they choose to become surrogates.

Diane G. Sanford, a psychologist and author specializing in women's reproductive mental health, said while she doesn't know much about Nadya Suleman's background, women that have obsessive-compulsive disorder can become fixated on different obsessions.

"Her obsession centers around children, having children and being a mother," she said. "To what degree are her esteem and identity based on being a mom and why has this from a young age been such a preoccupation of hers?"

Yolanda Garcia, 49, of Whittier, said she helped care for Nadya Suleman's autistic son three years ago.

"From what I could tell back then, she was pretty happy with herself, saying she liked having kids and she wanted 12 kids in all," Garcia told the Long Beach Press-Telegram.

"She told me that all of her kids were through in vitro, and I said 'Gosh, how can you afford that and go to school at the same time?"' she added. "And she said it's because she got paid for it."

Garcia said she did not ask for details.

Nadya Suleman holds a 2006 degree in child and adolescent development from California State University, Fullerton, and as late as last spring she was studying for a master's degree in counseling, college spokeswoman Paula Selleck told the Press-Telegram.

Her fertility doctor has not been identified. Her mother told the Los Angeles Times all the children came from the same sperm donor but she declined to identify him.

Birth certificates reviewed by The Associated Press identify a David Solomon as the father for the four oldest children. Certificates for the other children were not immediately available.

Angela Suleman told reporters Friday that doctors implanted far fewer than eight embryos but they multiplied. Experts said this could be possible since Nadya Suleman's system has likely been hyperstimulated for years with fertilization treatments and drugs.

The news that the octuplets' mother already had six children sparked an ethical debate. Some medical experts were disturbed to hear that she was offered fertility treatment, and troubled by the possibility that she was implanted with so many embryos.

"You should always shoot for one," said Dr. Marcelle Cedars, a professor and director of reproductive health at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center, who worried about the increased risk of potential health complications for the babies.

Others worried that she would be overwhelmed trying to raise so many children and would end up relying on public support.

"This woman could not comprehend the ramifications of having eight children of the same age at the same time," said Judith Horowitz, a Parkland, Fla.-based psychologist and author who works with couples on fertility issues. "After Pampers stops delivering the free diapers, then what?"

The eight babies — six boys and two girls — were delivered by cesarean section weighing between 1 pound, 8 ounces and 3 pounds, 4 ounces. Forty-six physicians and staff assisted in the deliveries. This case has gotten odder and odder the more that comes to light about it. Especially with the off-hand quote in there about the mother saying she was getting paid for the procedure. A close friend has investigated this option, extensively, and it is an extremely costly process. With additional reports that this woman's family recently declared bankruptcy, it appears there could be a good deal more to this story.

Medically, it's a whole other can of worms. CBS did a story (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/31/earlyshow/health/main4766068.shtml?tag=topStories;secondStory) consulting fertility physicians about the medical decisions made in this case:


Dr. Mark Surrey, a fertility expert, told Early Show national correspondent Hattie Kauffman that it is irresponsible and medically risky to implant eight embryos. "(Any doctor who would do that) should be criticized, censured, and professionally reviewed," Surrey said.

"I don't know of anyone who would applaud this as a good outcome," said Surrey, adding that it was fortunate that all eight babies survived.

“I completely agree with Dr. Surrey," Dr. James Grifo, Program Director at the New York University Fertility Center and one of the nation's top infertility specialists, told Early Show Saturday Edition co-anchor Erica Hill. "I know no physician who would put eight embryos in a patient. We don't do that, because of the risks. Our goal as practitioners is to help patients have a healthy offspring.

"Single pregnancies, where a single baby is born, are the best outcome. And those alone are risky. When you have twins, you add more risk. And when you have triplets, it's even more risk, and it’s logarithmic the number of babies."

Other medical experts worried that she would be overwhelmed trying to raise so many children and would end up relying on public support.

But Grifo said, "As a doctor, you treat infertility. It's not clear that this patient was infertile. Infertility is defined as a year of trying without being able to get pregnant. Whether someone has one baby, no babies, or six babies, if they tried for a year to get pregnant and meet the criteria for infertility, we then treat them.

"But we don't start with in-vitro fertilization treatment. Someone like this may get pregnant with much simpler treatments that have less risk and less chance of multiples. I don't know the story, but it does not make sense.

"Most of us in this situation, a woman under 35, would only put two embryos back, except in the extreme example of a patient who’s failed multiple attempts. We might put a third embryo in that situation. But I don't know people putting six embryos back." Given all the variables and risks in this situation, the doctor's actions seem to be highly suspect, to say the least.

We've already seen people seemingly "addicted" to plastic surgery, etc. I'm shocked that no red flags were raised after this woman made her requests regarding implantation of all the embryos at once.

BooBerry
01-31-2009, 07:37 PM
As long as she can afford them and doesn't wind up a 12-kid welfare Mom I could care less.

Then again, is she snaps one day from the stress and offs her kids it could and most likely would raise these issues to a new point and maybe people would start regulating this kind of invitro 1072072 embryos nonsense.

levil666
01-31-2009, 08:13 PM
The Doctor needs to be reviewed, and the children need to be taken into custody if she is unsuitable. I just feel a little sorry for her mom, but adults learn their pattern behavior as a child through parents. What a cluster fuck...

Luris Blear
01-31-2009, 08:21 PM
As long as she can afford them and doesn't wind up a 12-kid welfare Mom I could care less.

The mother lives with her mother, and is currently unemployed.
Friends and family also reported that Nadya Suleman worked as a psychiatric technician until she was injured on the job. Then she began having children and enrolled in school.

She graduated from Cal State Fullerton in 2006 with a bachelor of science degree in child and adolescent development, school officials said. She returned to pursue a master's in counseling, but last attended in the spring of 2008.

By juggling school and six children, Frickert said, Nadya Suleman proved to be "a lot more capable than the average person in handling stress."

She and her children live with her mother in a 1,550-square-foot home in Whittier, and her father has been working in Iraq as a translator to help support the family. Source (http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-octuplets31-2009jan31,0,6246659.story)

I'm sure donations will be accepted just as readily as government assistance. Which is to say, may as well open your wallet by choice before it's opened by force.

By the way, three adults and fourteen kids in a 1,550 square foot home. That is not a lot of space.

BooBerry
01-31-2009, 08:28 PM
If she lives with her Mom how come the Mom told the daughter when she got out of the hospital she would "be gone" ?
Hmm... how inconsistent.

Grendel
01-31-2009, 09:23 PM
The mother lives with her mother, and is currently unemployed.Which makes this story all the more curious. Doing some cursory internet research, it seems that IVF costs approximately $12,000 per cycle. According to this article, mom conceived all her children in this manner. Of the original six, only two were a result of a multiple birth.

Including this latest go-round, that's $72,000 in treatment costs and even that is assuming each attempt succeeded on the first try; they often don't.

Something seems very fishy, here...

Grendel
01-31-2009, 10:35 PM
Wow. Just...wow (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5627531.ece):


The single mother of octuplets born in California last week is seeking $2m (£1.37m) from media interviews and commercial sponsorship to help pay the cost of raising the children.

Nadya Suleman, 33, plans a career as a television childcare expert after it emerged last week that she already had six children before giving birth on Monday. She now has 14 below the age of eight...

Her earning power, though, could be diminished by a growing ethical and medical controversy....

US public reaction has been mixed: many have asked how an unemployed single mother can raise 14 children, as her first six have already strained the family budget. Angela and Ed Suleman, Nadya’s parents,bought her a two-bedroom bungalow in the suburb of Whittier in March 2007, but soon after got into debt and had to leave their own home.

They filed for bankruptcy and moved in with their daughter and grandchildren. Last week her father said he would return to his native Iraq to work as a translator and driver.

Nadya Suleman, who describes herself as a “professional student” living off education grants and parental money, broke up with her boyfriend before the birth of her first child seven years ago.

Luris Blear
01-31-2009, 10:42 PM
Including this latest go-round, that's $72,000 in treatment costs and even that is assuming each attempt succeeded on the first try; they often don't.

Something seems very fishy, here...And from the original quote/story above:
"She told me that all of her kids were through in vitro, and I said 'Gosh, how can you afford that and go to school at the same time?"' she added. "And she said it's because she got paid for it."
Not saying it makes anything less fishy, but maybe it can help fill in some blanks.

Grendel
02-01-2009, 12:11 AM
The thing is, barring a surrogacy-type situation, who would pay for someone else to go through IVF once, let alone seven times (at least)?

Aurone
02-01-2009, 12:56 AM
This is what this woman is in for.

:nervouswreck: :shakes: :headbrick: :myhead: :nosleep:

WarBeast
02-01-2009, 06:04 AM
wife and i went through ivf... that?s how we got our twins... we had awesome insurance and still paid a fair bit....i don't get how she is paying for this shit. also i don't get the two whole litters she was allowed to have..... where me and the wife went, two embryos were the maximum implanted, for the safety of all in involved.... this all just seems very irresponsible by both the mom and the doctors.... (i typed this on a ps3 controller while drunk.... it's not as eloquent as i?d prefer.... motherboard on my computer took a big shit.... fuck!!)

Elduardo
02-11-2009, 07:27 AM
14 kids and 3 adults = 17 people living in a 3 room apartment = child abuse.

Necromancer
02-11-2009, 03:05 PM
http://news.aol.com/article/octuplets-mom-no-one-can-care-for-14/334503?icid=200100397x1218686161x1201280255





After reading this the woman has been looking for a free ride and handouts IMO:dsp:

Sutter Kane
02-11-2009, 03:14 PM
What is she a possum? Gross...

I hate to say it but China's two-child policy suddenly seems more rational in this light. I bet one of those kids is gonna rob me at gunpoint when I'm old.

John and Kate plus 8, The Duggarnaughts, and the rest of the media outlet created this mess by making these people stars for having kids. Doesn't surprise me one bit.

Luris Blear
02-11-2009, 07:24 PM
John and Kate plus 8, The Duggarnaughts, and the rest of the media outlet created this mess by making these people stars for having kids. Doesn't surprise me one bit.

I think this woman would have the same issues with or without those television shows. I also don't think she was expecting eight, but firmly believe she was expecting more than one or two.

Necromancer
02-12-2009, 05:21 AM
My mom has said that if she had that many kids she would have shot herself a long time ago

Sutter Kane
02-12-2009, 12:57 PM
Your right Luris, she definitely had psychological problems before she popped out the octuplet's but what were her motives? Just to have more kids? Or to get payed. The article stated that she was under psych treatment for her bizarre obsession with children, my point is that Oprah and the Learning Channel may inadvertently be encouraging this sort of unhealthy behavior. I'm sure the idea of a million dollar payday influenced her decision making process. There needs to be some corporate responsibility. Maybe if Oprah and TLC made a statement saying they would no longer pay people who have multiple births for interviews because lets face it; you've heard one octuplets story you've heard them all.

Now if it was one baby born with eight heads...That I might be interested in.

Also who payed for all the IVF? Grendel said it was $72,000 for the treatment. That's a lot of dough for an unemployed single mother to come up with. Maybe an investor?

Luris Blear
02-12-2009, 07:46 PM
I really think that it would have happened with or without the teevee. As a point of note, all 8 of them received the middle name of "Angel."

That's not tv-fad creepy. That's bone-deep creepiness.

Sutter Kane
02-12-2009, 10:03 PM
:puke: Hive Queen
http://i514.photobucket.com/albums/t348/raggaboy82/0212_octomom_pregnant_pictures_e-1.jpg

Necromancer
02-13-2009, 03:09 AM
Also who payed for all the IVF? Grendel said it was $72,000 for the treatment. That's a lot of dough for an unemployed single mother to come up with. Maybe an investor?



My understanding is that whatever money was left oer from the $490 food stamps along with social security disability payments for for a couple of her previous kids along with whatever insurance coverage she now carries covered the expenses of the IVF. Not so suprising is that they have started asking for donations online to help raise these kids. Glad I don't live in CA

toxicangel19
02-13-2009, 10:30 AM
This is why people should go through a screening process before being able to qualify to pop kids out...tooo many bad irresponsible parents in this world.

Necromancer
02-13-2009, 04:52 PM
You can't just blame the woman. I find fault with the doctor, hospital, and insurance company for approving and conducting such a proceedure without checking into this request deeper than they did assuming there was any investigation at all. Everyone is in it for the money ; so hit them where it hurts ..........get doctor, hospital and insurnce company to help pay to raise these 8 children

Luris Blear
02-13-2009, 05:24 PM
This is why people should go through a screening process before being able to qualify to pop kids out...tooo many bad irresponsible parents in this world.That unfortunately opens the door for too much abuse.

"We have proof that your political leanings are caused by insanity (http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/11/never-trust-a-babysitter). You don't want to pass on genetic insanity to your children, do you?"

Catholicism has also promoted large families in the past, in hopes that Catholics would breed their way into outnumbering the heathens. Making it illegal for whatever heathens the powers-that-be dislike to breed can be very, very troublesome.

I agree with your motivation. It's the methods that are too open for abuse.

Sutter Kane
02-13-2009, 06:07 PM
These people who have that many kids are never intelligent. There are plenty of reasons to have a screening process. Take for instance Alfie Patten, he's 13 years old and the father of a newborn with his 15 year old girlfriend. This should never have happened and the two live with Alfie's unemployed father.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2233878.ece

Not only should this child not have been brought to term. The parents of the teens should be held responsible. Once again the taxpayers have to pay for stupid people who have children with NO mean of supporting that child whatsoever. We do need a screening process, it is socially irresponsible to let it continue.

Not a sermon, just a thought.

Luris Blear
02-13-2009, 06:11 PM
Alfie and the new mum had their kid in a hosptial East Sussex. None of this is the problem of any American citizen. :mhehe:

Sutter Kane
02-13-2009, 06:13 PM
The U.S. isn't the only country with this problem. People on this board live over there too. I'm sure Alfie's buying pampers on their dime.

C.H.U.D.
02-13-2009, 06:39 PM
Just give it a matter of a few months and child services or whatever will be all over this bitch. She doesn't even work, how's she supposed to take care of all these kids as a single mother? Now she's looking for handouts...what the fuck?!?! It's not like it was some freak accident she had all these kids, she did it on purpose....and now wants handouts?

As far as I'm concerned, this is child abuse. There's NO WAY all these kids will be able to live together healthy and happy.

EDIT: I am really curious what her gorcery bills are gonna look like! I live alone and I pay around $150/month just for myself!

Grendel
02-14-2009, 02:17 PM
These people who have that many kids are never intelligent. There are plenty of reasons to have a screening process. Take for instance Alfie Patten, he's 13 years old and the father of a newborn with his 15 year old girlfriend. This should never have happened and the two live with Alfie's unemployed father.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2233878.ece

Not only should this child not have been brought to term. The parents of the teens should be held responsible. Once again the taxpayers have to pay for stupid people who have children with NO mean of supporting that child whatsoever. We do need a screening process, it is socially irresponsible to let it continue."Held responsible?"

How, and for what?

Sutter Kane
02-16-2009, 06:40 PM
Charge the parents with neglect and take all three kids and put them in foster care. That's how would you hold the parents responsible in Alfie's case.

As far as the Octomom I wouldn't give her one fucking cent for those kids.

Let them eat cake.

Grendel
02-17-2009, 05:45 PM
Charge the parents with neglect and take all three kids and put them in foster care. That's how would you hold the parents responsible in Alfie's case.What you need to realize is, that "neglect" has a legal definition that isn't even close to being met, here. This, for example is from the Michigan Compiled Law (MCL 722.622):

(j) "Child neglect" means harm or threatened harm to a child's health or welfare by a parent, legal guardian, or any other person responsible for the child's health or welfare that occurs through either of the following:

(i) Negligent treatment, including the failure to provide adequate food, clothing, shelter, or medical care.

(ii) Placing a child at an unreasonable risk to the child's health or welfare by failure of the parent, legal guardian, or other person responsible for the child's health or welfare to intervene to eliminate that risk when that person is able to do so and has, or should have, knowledge of the risk.

Just because these kids managed to have sex and get pregnant doesn't mean either set of parents was being neglectful. While substantiating a protective services complaint has a lower standard of proof than a normal adult court proceeding ("preponderance of evidence," as opposed to "beyond a reasonable doubt") children--correctly--cannot just be swept up and put into foster care for something like this.

Sutter Kane
02-17-2009, 06:19 PM
Technically you may be correct Grendel. But I'm a pragmatist. To me its that simple However, its not up to me so I'll just stand on my soapbox and scream my opinions at pedestrians.

Darkgod
02-28-2009, 10:22 AM
Vivid just offered her a 1 million dollar porn contract.

Sutter Kane
02-28-2009, 10:24 AM
:puke:

AndyP
06-04-2009, 10:35 PM
Apparently, she is getting a reality show similar to "John and Kate Plus 8" over in England.

Sutter Kane
06-05-2009, 12:08 PM
I guess she got her "Fairy-tale" ending. Having children is no special feat, I'm sick of this woman and her brood. Why can't they just take these future bank robbers out of her claws?

Darkgod
06-05-2009, 01:21 PM
LOL, shes annoying.