PDA

View Full Version : A Different Take On F13 (2009) **SPOILERS**



levil666
02-13-2009, 01:17 PM
************************SPOILERS THROUGHOUT**************************




Let me preface this by saying, I have been waiting for this movie since it was announced on UHM over a year ago. That being said, I felt like a twitching addict for the last week before getting my fix at the midnight showing. Through my hatred for Nispel and how he raped the TCM remake, I actually really liked this flick. Yes the characters were annoying as hell. Yes, there was no explanation why these mysterious pot plants were growing out in the woods. However, there was plenty to make up for it. As we all are (I am assuming) avid fans of this wonderful franchise, I actually see the revisioning route this film was trying to take. However, it was not an ecapsulation of the first four, but the first three (seriously, how could it be all four without good old Tommy Jarvis.) *spoilers ahead*

The way they wrapped up the first movie in the intro was perfect, as this was Jasons story, and not his mothers anymore. Fast forward, and you have a raging 29 year old mommas boy who has a screw loose from watching his mom get her head chopped off. Now Camp Crystal Lake has been condemned to Urban Legend (as usual) and a bunch of sex hungry stoners are trying to track down a pot crop. That first 20 minutes laid the ground work for a lot of great kills to be expected. Whitney and her friends are sitting around the campfire, and the inevitable split up of the group happens, with the “good couple” (Whitney and her boyfriend) venturing off, and stumbling on Jason’s lair. Meanwhile, the stoner loner finds his crop with, only to be greeted by yours truly. Oh, and the sex starved couple… It seriously had Jasons best sleeping-bag-kill to date.

Fast forward six weeks, and you have the typical group of know it all college kids stopping in at the local gas n’ go to fill up and mock the locals. There you meet Clay, Whitney’s estranged older brother who is riding his motor cycle around the lake handing out a “have you seen Whitney” flyer. He’s inevitably mocked by the pompous rich boy of the group. Why should the group care? They’re off for a weekend of drugs, drinking games, and premarital sex, plus it gives Mr. Abercrombie (the main one, as there are two in this) a chance to show off daddy’s lake house. He really didn’t die soon enough, but provided some entertainment so it didn’t bother me too much.

Once they arrive to the lake house, the daddy’s boy is busy playing babysitter, and the story is split between the lake house and Clay’s search for Whitney. Then the stories come together, and daddy’s boy gets heated. Meanwhile Abercrombie #2 and his girlfriend decide to take the boat for a spin. Now, although lines like “You’re such a sociopath, but what does that make me?” would typically piss me off, if it weren’t for the awesomeness of Jason to take care of those twits. Doolan had a very good point about the token black guy. In five minutes we get to hear about how the rest of the groups requests are based on the fact he’s black, and the other characters were also terribly cliché, but take it back to part two where you got to constantly hear about the cripple be in training. For WHAT?!? That’s what was so much fun, the films were campy and cliché. They tried to capture it in this, and didn’t do a great job, but at least all of the annoyingly shallow characters were done away with in fairly creative ways. In one scene, it actually looked like Jason was thinking “Well, now that I have her in my hands, what do I do? I know there is something here I haven’t used yet…”

The audience is left in the dark about a lot (which I hope is taken care of with the release of the Director’s cut, but if you have watched the first three as many times as I have, you can piece it together for the most part through hopeful assumptions.) Everything from one of the characters using psychological manipulation to the setting of a show down in an old red barn was a perfect combo of the second and third films imo. It was also good to see Jason running again (for those of you who may argue, he was a runner in the first few, before Jarvis resurrected him.) I wouldn’t classify this as a sequel, since it captured all of the elements of the first three flicks. In the end, all I can say is that I am glad they “revisioned it.” However, one terribly disappointing part is what has become of Camp Crystal Lake, but I’ll leave that for you to discover. I am just glad that it breathed new life into a franchise that succumbed to a space sequel (although I do like Jason X.) This also gives me hope that maybe they will do a revisioning of the Jarvis installment, because that was seriously undercut in the 4th, 5th, and 6th from what it could have been.

Story: 2/5
Nudity: 3/5
Blood: 5/5
Gore: 2.5/5
Drug Usage: 5/5
Comedy: 3/5

Overall score: 7/10

H78
02-13-2009, 01:21 PM
Please preface your reviews with *SPOILER* tags if it contains spoilers.

3/6
02-13-2009, 01:22 PM
lol ya not shit

but the movie kicks ass..and i dont really think the characters are annoying...i liked seeing a f13 focused on my generation, like the characters are TOTALLY people i hang out with lol

steelba
02-13-2009, 01:29 PM
I had to edit your post, post a spoiler warning you dumbass :finger3:

steelba
02-13-2009, 07:55 PM
Saw it, liked it, reiewed it, and agree with your rating.

Good review btw.

Darkgod
02-13-2009, 11:04 PM
It seriously had Jasons best sleeping-bag-kill to date.


UNTRUE... though i did like the film

Misfit
02-13-2009, 11:13 PM
so steelba is there not much gore? or in friday the 13th standards it has lots

Vincenzo Incendio
02-13-2009, 11:33 PM
It was done in the same style of the TCM remake. I have a hard time liking anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it, but it was alright.

It's a decent movie, I'll watch it again. It could have been a lot worse, that is for sure.

And there are some rockin' tits in this one. :)

steelba
02-13-2009, 11:37 PM
so steelba is there not much gore? or in friday the 13th standards it has lots
There is some gore and decent blood, it's not up there with Part 4 in terms of gore. Well none of them were as gory as 4 to me :ahheh:

Jason was meaner and the film felt a lot darker during the killing sequences as opposed to the more comical Jasons.

Vincenzo Incendio
02-13-2009, 11:39 PM
SPOILERS@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

One thing I didn't understand was why Clay and his sister dumped his corpse in the lake at the end. First, how the hell did they drag his body out there? His sister has been in a sitting position for a month and half, her muscles would be very weak. Clay himself has been running for his life for almost the entire night. And Jason is a freaking monster! It doesn't make any sense. Plus, it's a freaking crime scene, this guy just murdered like a dozen people in those woods. It doesn't make any sense to waste time dumping him in the lake when they have to get to the authorities and explain to them this bloodbath.

Misfit
02-13-2009, 11:39 PM
:hmmm: i c

Vincenzo Incendio
02-13-2009, 11:39 PM
BTW, Part 2 is still my favorite, but this one is as good, as any other Jason film, and better than most.

HEKTIK15
02-13-2009, 11:43 PM
Going to see it tomarrow , I am keeping an open mind. My generation already went through Jason........but I am looking kinda looking forwards to it. MCL.

hackerslacker
02-13-2009, 11:44 PM
film was a waste of money. it reminded me of a softcore porn with killing ,without the blood.

Wally The Cannibal
02-14-2009, 12:36 AM
It was cool minus the minor continuity errors...went from day to night very fast between the boat sequence to Clay and the girl running around Camp Crystal Lake. Would've enjoyed more gore as well. Michael Bay should keep his dirty paws off this shit though and stick to Transformers.

strtfghtr
02-14-2009, 01:01 AM
I really don't see how this was a remake...seemed to me more like a sequel to me? :shrugs:

It just ignores some of the other films like Jason Goes to Hell and Jason X did.

I mostly agree with your review but the unexplained pot, tunnels, keeping the girl, and Jason's Macgyvering of traps and electrical engineering backround bothered me.

I'd give it a 6.5/10

buffyslayedme717
02-14-2009, 02:22 AM
I really dug the first twenty minutes...the rest of the movie should have been like that...those characters were a lot better and more reminiscent of past entries.

levil666
02-14-2009, 04:22 PM
Saw it, liked it, reiewed it, and agree with your rating.

Good review btw.

Thanks man. I appreciate it. Glad you liked it, and totally agree, not as much gore as the first four, but a lot of blood.

levil666
02-14-2009, 04:24 PM
I really don't see how this was a remake...seemed to me more like a sequel to me? :shrugs:

It just ignores some of the other films like Jason Goes to Hell and Jason X did.

I mostly agree with your review but the unexplained pot, tunnels, keeping the girl, and Jason's Macgyvering of traps and electrical engineering backround bothered me.

I'd give it a 6.5/10

Yeah, those things all bugged me to strt. However, what can you expect from Bay? At least I could gain a little more respect for Nispel since he didn't rape this one like he did with TCM.

txjeff07
02-16-2009, 10:31 AM
I enjoyed this flick and agree with your review although I gave it 8/10.

*****************SPOILERS AHEAD***************

Thought Jason was meaner and more pissed off in this one which was good. Didn't like how the camp never really was a part of the movie. Characters were ok aside from Trent(what a fucking bitch he was). The fact that Jason had an underground lair with homemade security was far fetched and we were accustomed to Jason being a brutal killer with no remorse so the fact that he kept a hostage for a month made no sense(locket or not) that's just not Jason's style. Liked the new spin on the sleeping bag kill but thought the climax was a bit abrupt. The final showdown lasted only a few minutes so I was a bit letdown there but all in all I enjoyed it and thought it was a solid entry to the series.

steelba
02-17-2009, 05:03 PM
I really dug the first twenty minutes...the rest of the movie should have been like that...those characters were a lot better and more reminiscent of past entries.
The second set of charectors were personable and just like the set in Part 7 :starefreak:

3/6
02-17-2009, 05:13 PM
The second set of charectors were personable and just like the set in Part 7 :starefreak:

true dat...the dude freaking out cause his dads(part 7 it was his uncle) cabin getting trashed

the stoners..only thing difernt form the characters in 7 and the remake, was that part 7had the ugly/nerdy chick and the sci fi dude

i hate how people are like .."looks like a abercrombie catalog" duh, thats the way peeps dress nowa days pretty much..look back at past jason movies...there is ALWAYS a kid rockin some type of preppy shit, like in part 7, the mofo with the sweater tied around his neck..part 3, Rick..hes got a sweater tied around his neck too. PArt 4, Cripin Glovers character is wearing a polo type shirt. people dress preppy, get over it

steelba
02-17-2009, 07:26 PM
People wore alot of Abercrombie back in the late 90's, fashion hasn't changed much since then, a few minor tweaks here and there, but thats about it. Infact the brand names are about the only thing that changed, Tommy, Polo, Nautica, Karl Kani, Calvin Klein, Abercrombie iz Bitch, were the big ones in 97-00. Plus everyone in the flick was early to late 20's, most of the cast was 26-29, so it's more representative of my age group then todays teens.

Still a solid flick regardless of the haters :smokin2:

ReD
02-18-2009, 10:59 AM
I pretty much agree with the peeps that like it.

It was the obligatory F13 flick. One of the stronger entries in the overall series IMO because it did not try to overdo itself.

Having the teens as annoying as they were or reflective as they were was the point in reflecting the times.

Their have been asians, token black guys, geeks, sluts, druggies, preppy characters littered all throughout the series for their respective times. Nothing has changed.

This particular F13 I would say falls in line similar to the Final Chapter and the New Blood in terms of style of story structure. My only real gripe now thinking about it outside of the ending and abundance of machete was the fact that the camp did not have kids as a legitimate target threat. However because of the way the story was told with the Crystal Lake already being run down and ancient. It would not have made sense.

OtepFan616
02-18-2009, 11:34 AM
Really liked it. Just got a question.Was it a remake? sequel? or did it interweave with the 2 n 3? I kinda thought that it did interweave.....but you never know. A solid entry into the jason series. 7/10

Wally The Cannibal
02-18-2009, 02:30 PM
It's a remake. If it were a late addition in the series it would've had to have been titled "Jason Voorhees" (see "Rocky" series) to keep up with current standards and practices.

levil666
02-18-2009, 02:33 PM
Really liked it. Just got a question.Was it a remake? sequel? or did it interweave with the 2 n 3? I kinda thought that it did interweave.....but you never know. A solid entry into the jason series. 7/10

It interwieved the first three, imo. Unlike the original idea when it was announced, it did not seem to have anything in common with the fourth aside from the lake house setting with the group partying, but it seemed like they were just trying to throw in a bunch of victims for Jason, rather than having a family also visiting like they did with the Jarvis'. It held elements from the first three (mostly 2 & 3) throughout like the run down camp (in part two, they were at a different camp, on crystal lake, but not camp blood itself.) However, they went the route of the third with the teens on a trip to have a good relaxing trip (joke was on them.) Also, the transformation of Jason from mask 2 mask, the barn setting from the third, the psychological connection with Jason from the second. However, it did include homages to deaths that weren't featured until later segments like the sleeping bag death (I believe wasn't until VII.) It was nice to see them lay the ground work for Jason with this reimaging rather than a point by point remake of the first one (although they did include the toned down ending of the opening sequence.)