PDA

View Full Version : Review: Against The Dark


Prince of Horror
02-19-2009, 06:02 PM
Well this a very short review and summary on how I feel about this film, so it won’t be long.

Now this is a movie about vampires taking over the world and such, and the government hires a group of hunters to go out and fight against the undead.

Now that’s it, if there is anything else to be known about the film, I really don’t give a damn because it sucks, from the lack of gore and action, to the very slow pacing, which pissed me off. I thought that since Steve was in the film it would be a little entertaining, like SOME OF THEM, but this was bullshit. The vampires looked like zombies and we get two sexy female hunters who don’t even say two words throughout the entire film.

I think if the film would have had a little more gore, with quicker pacing, some decent choreography, and a lot more action, it would be worth a rent, but due to the lack of things that I have mentioned above, this gets a 4. Don’t waste your time, please, I beg you.

WHAT IS HORROR COMING TO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
levil666
02-19-2009, 06:10 PM
Thanks for saving me five bucks at blockbuster PoH. :downlow:
Misfit
02-19-2009, 07:22 PM
http://www.websmileys.com/sm/violent/sterb268.gif
steelba
02-19-2009, 11:21 PM
I'm certain this review is worse than the film :straightface:
Prince of Horror
02-20-2009, 02:44 AM
http://www.websmileys.com/sm/violent/sterb268.gif

Why read my reviews if you don't like them. :bitchslap:
Yannis
02-20-2009, 03:27 AM
What a load of crap. I did not even rent that piece of shit. A friend downloaded it and thank god i fell asleep and did not finish it.

I was not aware that Steven Seagal was in it when we hit the play button. If I did I would have avoided it but still I was curious to see what kind of horror movie would Seagal make. Just don't bother with this at all.
woodenheart
02-20-2009, 05:57 AM
wow, I like Steven Seagal too. I wanted to catch this.
FrighT MasteR
02-20-2009, 06:07 AM
Skimmed it a while back -- looked horrible, so I didn't even bother.
Prince of Horror
02-20-2009, 06:10 AM
Skimmed it a while back -- looked horrible, so I didn't even bother.

Yeah it was real horrible, though it did have a few good scenes, it didn't matter about that or the damn story in the end.
strtfghtr
02-20-2009, 07:54 AM
what if you were drunk...would it be funny after a few shots?
KING
02-20-2009, 08:11 AM
I tend to avoid Steven Seagel flicks.
Prince of Horror
02-20-2009, 07:09 PM
what if you were drunk...would it be funny after a few shots?

No, I don't think you are talking to me, but no.
Titanosaurus
02-21-2009, 09:23 PM
It was just like most of Seagal's more recent efforts- COMPLETE CRAP. it was boring and focused more on a bunch of loser stock characters with no personality or acting skills of any sort. Then when Seagal and his "vampire"-fighters show up, we usually see them kicking ass for a full minute! 4/10 for me as well. I say stick to Seagal's earlier stuff like Out for Justice and Under Siege. :yes:
woodenheart
02-21-2009, 10:17 PM
Above The Law....best Seagal movie ever :yes:
Sutter Kane
02-22-2009, 08:16 AM
If its not Under Siege 3 then I'm not watching another Seagal flick.
Misfit
02-22-2009, 10:36 AM
Why read my reviews if you don't like them. :bitchslap:

i am still waiting for you to write a review :hmmm:
steelba
02-22-2009, 11:12 AM
you and me both :starefreak:
Prince of Horror
02-22-2009, 06:25 PM
Well why don't you both stop reading them, do you two seriously have a life.
woodenheart
02-22-2009, 06:43 PM
streamed this earlier, why?..hell I don't know. Totally useless movie.
steelba
02-22-2009, 10:36 PM
Well why don't you both stop reading them, do you two seriously have a life.
Why don't you quit hurting our eyes with your idiotic paragraphs :starefreak: