Here's a video with the full update on whats happening with the "IT" remake!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQCX8DfonQM
Printable View
Here's a video with the full update on whats happening with the "IT" remake!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQCX8DfonQM
Here's your first look at Penny Wise the Dancing Clown Attachment 25364
He looks Fucking Menacing & Bad Ass!!!:metalbang::axekill::metalbang:
Needless to say I'm intrigued.:thumbup:
:confident:
The pic means nothing to me. A clown is a clown. Pennywise is all about interaction, behavior, and personality.
It wasn't the way Curry looked that made his Pennywise so good, actually I didn't like his look but the way he portrayed Pennywise is what made it so good.
I agree. It's all about the performance. Although, he does look kinda cool.
All clowns have that creep factor especially if they are scowling into the camera. At some point you can't even tell them apart, especially with a partial profile such as this.
Give the original Bozo some yellow contacs and have him stare into a camera like this it would be exactly the same.
I was looking through some pictures on imdb.com of Pennywise and I did not like what I saw. In a nutshell it's as if Muschietti wants a CGI clown. :facepalm:
I was never the biggest fan of Stephen King's It and the remake will probably not resonate well with me.
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt1396484/
There is a 90% chance this movie will be disappointing and tacked on to the list of failed Stephen King adaptions. To think otherwise would be foolish.
:straightface:Jackie Earl was not the problem with that Shit Fest ....
I regardless if this flick is another Shit Fest or not. I'm still gonna check it out .
And as far as how all these remake monsters look . I want them all to look familiar but more evil :rockin: Jackie Earls Freddy might not got the more evil looking part right? But I still think this Pennywise is both familiar an more Evil looking than the original :metalbang::axekill::metalbang:
No doubt it was piss poor from start to finish...I agree with ya there dude:coolbeer:
The Elm Street remake sucked for one reason...it was done right (perfection) the first time...period!
Any attempt to "reimagine" or "remake" was doomed from the start. (IMO)
I am happy to say I now own a copy of Stephen King's It the movie and all I can say is...Tim Curry's the only good thing about it...okay the first hour and a half is good with the Losers Club and how they meet It, then the second half with them as adults gets rather...boring...and the ending is weird and anti-climatic and not in a serious story-telling way.
I think the idea is good, I have yet to read the book.
This new movie is actually looking really promising, I love the new look for Pennywise, you can't really remake the Tim Curry Pennywise, so I'm glad they went with a new and very interesting design for the clown in this remake and hopefully the ending ill be WAY better and have more violence that the TV movie simply couldn't do.
The problem with the movie is it makes everyone think this is a creepy clown on a rampage story and it is far from it.
The ending in the book is brilliant and nothing at all like the way it was portrayed in the movie version. Frankly they can't do it.
In the book it flashes back to the losers club and their first encounter of banishing IT.
They had sex in a sewer tube before going to face IT.
It was an act to form a strong bond, and enhance the power they had as a group. There are also hints that doing this made them all remember their promise as adults
since if you recall not many remember that particular summer. They were all in what is typically known as "The Derry Effect".
At that time they knew they would have to face IT again and this helped them all recall what took place to fight IT as adults.
The story isn't about a scary clown, it is about childhood, growing up, and the loving bonds that are formed as children that get lost going into adulthood.
All of this melded together is something a movie can never possibly convey like reading the words within the book.
The book is a masterpiece and should be left alone. The TV movie is a joke and to prove that point everyone raves about Curry's performance which is indeed good
but shows hardly anyone sees the true story here and simply focuses on the creepy clown. :dsp:
Anyone who wants to judge the TV version of IT or the upcoming movie but has not read the book cannot accurately have an honest opinion on it in regards to the overall story and the many meanings that lie within.
Those opinions are simply based on the movie alone and not the true realization of IT and how dozens of underlying relationships tie the story together and what King's vision was all about.
well damn MAC!? Well put! You must be a writer or something:D
I need to read the book....i've heard nothing but good things...
I have dabbled with it :confident:
The book is a must read. You won't get 200 pages in before you realize there is no way a movie will work.
A movie may be good in and of itself but it is impossible to be considered good when compared to what you are reading.
The marketing is already a turn off for me, basing it around Pennywise and his "look" when that is far from what this story is about.