Originally Posted by
réÐþÁ†µ
With the exception of Stallones newest installments in his franchises (Rocky and Rambo). You can pretty much bet that any new sequel/reboot/remake is going to be something different than what its predacessors where in terms of feel.
It helps that Stallone has control over his two franchises. Which is why he was able to take the characters and improve upon them with quality simplistic stories. Less is more basically and Stallone did just that with his franchises. Say what you want about him as an actor or his career. However he atleast put together two quality farewell movies for his series.
Whereas what do you see from all these other series that have since had a sequel years and years later aka Die Hard 4, Indy 4, etc. They went a bit of a different route, the fanboys got irked and that was that.
Stallone stayed true to his series of films.
Ghostbusters 3 for all intent and purposes will be a different film than its predacessors. The style in which the first film was made was timeless. Like so many other 80s movies, it was an epic in filmmaking and storytelling. You cant replicate that kind of success. I also find hard to believe that Ramis, Akroyd (spelling) and Murray will have complete control over the film and the film will be made to be carried by the new Ghostbusters. The old fanboys will be disappointed in that while the studios aim for a newer fanbase with more current comedians.
At the end of the day, my rant is basically saying the obvious which is something I end up doing often. Ghostbusters 3 will not be the same as its predacessors as much as me or anyone else may want it to be.