0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 727 Given: 363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
8/10 is more than I thought anyone would give it. Maybe a 6/10....maybe.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 286 Given: 328 |
I didn't really care for the "shaky cam" style of doing movies , but I do understand what Romero was trying to accomplish , but it is the least favorite of the Dead series for me.
Like, so many people out there were trying to track this down. And it just...got delivered on a tweet. What the hell.
"The individual's rights will be protected only so long as they don't conflict with the state."
“Watch your thoughts, they become words;
watch your words, they become actions;
watch your actions, they become habits;
watch your habits, they become character;
watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.”
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Romero tried to do something different and in myopinion it did not work. It was not bad but it was not Romero therefore i did not really like it. He should stick to what he is doing best and just leave the whole handcam point of view. The narrator thing was also something he could have avoited. Just hope we see something better from him in his next movie.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 0 Given: 0 |
Go back 3 years and this might have worked, but I definitely feel Cloverfield and REC did the hyper-realistic 'first hand account' horror film better. Romero's film is way too clean to ever be considered real, with unnatural acting, dialouge, and editing. I dont feel like I am watching anyone's real life account at any point in the picture. The only thing going for the film is the gore, the zombie deaths are pretty sweet but everything else is pretty standard. Even then, most of the effects are computerized, which is a 180 from the amazing effects work that set Romero apart originally. Its good, not the disaster its made out to be, but not up to Romero's best. 7/10 is generous.